A fast and short tutorial for using Maven2 with ANT.
Based on:
have fun. ..
Friday, March 14, 2008
High Colonic Enemain Nj
Maven2 Tutorial with ANT
A fast and short tutorial for using Maven2 with ANT.
Based on:
have fun. ..
A fast and short tutorial for using Maven2 with ANT.
Based on:
have fun. ..
30-30 Marlin Gun Value
Which JavaScript Fame Work?
The analysis of the possible solutions in the current project I am once again landed in meeting the ever recurring question: Which do you choose Framework?
once again seeking a JavaScript framework. In principle, the question comes again and again and again and again Answer. The first consideration: Nehme just do what you know. Since would Prototype + Scriptaculous , Dojo and MooTools . Intuitively, I would prefer MooTools. I like the slimness of the code (compared to the prototype). Dojo and is, in my opinion, still too slow. Despite the advanced version, and now a strong support from many other communities / companies / products, it is just too clunky. I should perhaps mention at this point but that I always (from the perspective: comfortable development) the recognition of Dojo very interesting find. So MooTools. Fine thing. Do I get there, and rightly so wonderful. The next consideration: What does the market as well? Was not there something else?
Off course! JQuery ... Have you ever heard. So I make myself ran to the cause and see the opportunities, success stories, documentation, etc. What you just the way everything compares as a developer. I must say it rocks. At least at first glance. well documented. Extensive examples. MooTools for transfer passengers really a problem. Also so expect many forums that MooTools in terms of "event handling" in certain situations (that I could not understand, unfortunately) would be long Sammer. I decide to me almost as much for JQuery. As I roam randomly across a comprehensive performance test of that framework. The test can be found here. (I have the results in a combined slideshow.)
Now I'm a little stumped. On average (see slide show) MooTools seems to be the fastest implementation. Dojo not as slow as I "feel" and JQuery is not as fast as promised.
partly contradictory statements make the decision not easy. Now if the poor performance of JQuery or MooTools but from? If the difference is crucial? As always, there are many statements. Partly contradictory. Who I believe now? The so-called Technology Evangelists? The fans? The developers of individual frameworks? The benchmarks? It would be interesting to know how the others make those decisions for the successful solution and accelerate this?
The analysis of the possible solutions in the current project I am once again landed in meeting the ever recurring question: Which do you choose Framework?
once again seeking a JavaScript framework. In principle, the question comes again and again and again and again Answer. The first consideration: Nehme just do what you know. Since would Prototype + Scriptaculous , Dojo and MooTools . Intuitively, I would prefer MooTools. I like the slimness of the code (compared to the prototype). Dojo and is, in my opinion, still too slow. Despite the advanced version, and now a strong support from many other communities / companies / products, it is just too clunky. I should perhaps mention at this point but that I always (from the perspective: comfortable development) the recognition of Dojo very interesting find. So MooTools. Fine thing. Do I get there, and rightly so wonderful. The next consideration: What does the market as well? Was not there something else?
Off course! JQuery ... Have you ever heard. So I make myself ran to the cause and see the opportunities, success stories, documentation, etc. What you just the way everything compares as a developer. I must say it rocks. At least at first glance. well documented. Extensive examples. MooTools for transfer passengers really a problem. Also so expect many forums that MooTools in terms of "event handling" in certain situations (that I could not understand, unfortunately) would be long Sammer. I decide to me almost as much for JQuery. As I roam randomly across a comprehensive performance test of that framework. The test can be found here. (I have the results in a combined slideshow.)
Now I'm a little stumped. On average (see slide show) MooTools seems to be the fastest implementation. Dojo not as slow as I "feel" and JQuery is not as fast as promised.
partly contradictory statements make the decision not easy. Now if the poor performance of JQuery or MooTools but from? If the difference is crucial? As always, there are many statements. Partly contradictory. Who I believe now? The so-called Technology Evangelists? The fans? The developers of individual frameworks? The benchmarks? It would be interesting to know how the others make those decisions for the successful solution and accelerate this?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)